Tuesday, 10 November 2015

Polygamy: A Cultural Excuse to Violate Human or “Woman” Rights

                                                                                                                                            By Kemoh Mansaray

Like organisms, societies have a life cycle. From inception, they grow, mature, and die. Societal growth could be measured in terms of its intellectual, material, and moral development. Such growth or changes are indicators of a continuum, which stretches from primitiveness to modernity. Generally, a people move from a primitive society toward a modern society, unfortunately, events over the last 50 years in our country Sierra Leone defy this kind of thinking.

Reference to African cultural values in an attempt to justify or garner support for the practice of polygamy in Sierra Leone portrays culture as though it is a static phenomenon. Culture, as a matter of fact, is always in a state of flux. Culture is not cast in concrete it is always evolving. 

As a society grows intellectually, materially, and morally, its culture is constantly being created, recreated, and shifted. Thus, in proportion to their intellectual, material, and moral development, a people continually evaluate their culture. They not only weed out the bad and keep the good, but also pass on the good to the next generation. 

One of the key elements of a family is the marriage institution. It plays an important role in the relationship that exists between men, women and children. Marriage can take many forms, monogamous or polygamous or other.

A few years ago I saw some young women while they were still young girls growing up in Sierra Leone in polygamous homes, I stood uncertain of their position on the matter of polygamy though I have witness firsthand the effects of polygamy. That was until South African President Jacob Zuma got in front of the world and defended polygamy with culture.

Before going any further, let me try to define what polygamy is. Polygamy is a hotly contested practice and open to widespread misunderstandings. For a deeper understanding of the concept of polygamy and how it affects women, a broader definition is needed. According to Maillu (1988:1) as cited in Nkomazana, 2006, a polygamist is simply a man who is married to more than one wife, living with them at the same time. 

Now you can see where my argument is. Bluntly speaking polygamy is a violation of Human Rights and should not be tolerated because of culture. The problem with polygamy is primarily that it is a structurally in egalitarian practice in both theory and fact. Polygamy should be opposed for this reason. 
President Zuma’s speech triggered something in me, making me want to find the cultural link between polygamy and the African tradition that I am so proud of. In the end, I realized my firm standing position on polygamy. When polygamy (a man married to more than one wife) became part of our culture, polyandry (woman married to more than one husband) was never considered. A practice that does not promote equality is a guaranteed no in modern societies and I just have one question for polygamy defenders: what's culture got to do with?

Let me draw your attention again to area of non-material culture where changes have been noted but not deeply studied in our African setting  - “African traditional family system”. Family formations through marriage are of different types among Africans. These are the Christian marriages, customary marriages, Muslim marriages, and ordinance marriages. These four types end up as either monogamous or polygamous marriages. Christian and ordinance marriages are monogamous while Muslim and customary marriages and polygamous.

To Africans including Sierra Leone, the institution of polygamy is nothing strange. Polygamy was the acceptable form of marriage in Africa prior to the arrival of the colonizers and Christianity. When polygamy became a part of our society, men ruled and wanted their sexual desires satisfied. Men wanted to have a male son who could take over his household when he died, he wanted to show that he has power and wealth so he married all the wives he could to fulfill his dream.

There are many reasons why Africans practiced polygamy but here are the common reasons given through the years:

A man's wealth is measured by the number of wives and children he has.

The more wives a man has, the more political alliances he makes.

Agriculturally is easier to have a big family to cultivate the land

Women were safer in a large household

It gives men sexual gratification 

Polygamy is a child spacer, it allows a woman time to rest before trying to bear another son for her husband.

Considering the reasons why African men marry more than one wife, it is obvious that Where resource inequalities are great among men, women will choose to marry polygamously. Where inequalities are comparatively low, women will chose to marry monogamously. This theory is female-empowering and functional. This recognizes polygamy or monogamy as rational choices to be made in accordance with social determinants, such as resource inequality.
For those arguing on the side of custom or ‘African Tradition’, let us then briefly examine the long and arduous road women have endured under men. In our progress toward modernization, there was a time when money, as we know it today, did not exist for use in commercial transactions. As a result, a man's wealth was not determined in dollar terms or Leones as the case may be in Sierra Leone or other currencies, but in terms of the number of wives, children, livestock, etc. he possessed. Wives, then, were not only looked upon as sex objects and baby manufacturing machines, but also as the primary source of farm labor. Men were not only interested in women's bodies, but also interested in whether their mammary organs were erect or flabby. As a result, when women became spent from bearing children, hard farm labor, and their sexual values depreciated, their husbands married younger girls. No wonder why Soul Singer James Brown sings, "It's a man's world." 
 
Thus, are we then saying that the use of women as sex objects, workhorses, and abandoning them when they begin to age is an African custom? I, too, am an African. More importantly, I relish African values. However, I consider polygamy a gross violation of Human Rights and should not be tolerated in any society and is not a display of African values.
Polygamy is also really about male choice and preference for sexual variety to ensure male reproductive success. The extent of the opportunity to seek sexual variety may vary, however, with social circumstances, such as the degree to which women are available and how costly they are as wives (their economic value).

Polygamy has long been associated with gender inequality and this remains the case. In particular, the United Nations has consistently taken the position that polygamy contravenes women's equality rights. The U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, which monitors compliance of states parties to the Convention, issued a general recommendation in 1992 that included the following.

“Polygamous marriage contravenes a woman's right to equality with men, and can have such serious emotional and financial consequences for her and her dependents that such marriages ought to be discouraged and prohibited” (Campbell, Bala, & Duvall-Antonacopoulos, 2005 P. 6 - 20 ). 

The Committee notes with concern that some States parties, whose constitutions guarantee equal rights, permit polygamous marriage in accordance with personal or customary law. This violates the constitutional rights of women, and breaches the provisions of article 5(a) of the Convention (Campbell, Bala, & Duvall-Antonacopoulos, 2005 P. 6 – 20). 

Women do not like polygamy but cannot do anything about it. Divorce is the de facto right of men in the Sierra Leone, whatever the behaviour of the husband. Men can and do divorce women when they want too, although this was comparatively rare in our so-called culture. The fact that men can take another wife or divorce their existing wife is a source of insecurity and anxiety for women and helps to ensure their adherence to conservative social norms.
Where is the right of the woman? Yes, polygamy is not illegal in many Africa countries. But how does it square with a Constitution in these countries that provides for the equal rights of women? The South African Law Reform Commission for instance as cited in (Morna, (2010), concluded that “a system that allows men to have several wives while a woman can only have one husband is self-evidently unequal” (p. 28).

Let me still ask the question to those who still support the idea of polygamy, Do African men still want many children in this world filled with orphans and abandoned children? Do you, African women still think that polygamy is a good birth control method? Do many polygamous African sisters still think that you are not good enough to get a husband all to yourself without sharing? Answers to these questions will undoubtedly support my argument that polygamy is a violation of woman rights or at least a violation of Human Rights.

The reasoning that there are more women than men no longer makes sense. Perhaps then, men were dying in the army and women were just too many. However, today men are no longer the only sex serving in the military. The death rate of men in the army has dropped significantly. 
Even though I agree with having pride in our African culture, seen in light of the dominant western culture, this culture cannot be reason enough to continue this practice. The fear that traditional African culture will die is not sufficient to warrant acceptance of a tradition, like polygamy, which is outdated and harmful to women.

In conclusion, I have observed that traditionally, polygamy was regarded as a symbol of prestige and value among the Africans. While polygamy was evidently an acceptable way of life among Sierra Leoneans in the past, the voices of women were suppressed and marginalized to the point that they became the helpless and mindless victims. Though polygamy is still widely practiced, judging from the way things are happen in most African countries including Sierra Leone, I would not be surprised that legislations are put in place to discourage polygamy in the not too distant future. One way to get out of this mentality is to help educate all African women when we heed what Rousseau once admonished, we would be able to lessen the insidious tide of sexist male dominance in Africa: "When women become good mothers, men will become good husbands and fathers." When African women, by their education, knowledge and opportunity, become good mothers, they will rear good boys who will, in turn, become good men, husbands, or fathers.


References

Campbell, A., Bala, N., & Duvall-Antonacopoulos, K. (2005). Polygamy in Canada: Legal and 
Social Implications for Women and Children: A Collection of Policy Research Reports. Ottawa, ON, CAN: Status of Women Canada. Retrieved from http://www.ebrary.com

Morna, C. L. (2010). Polygamy, promiscuity and progressive leadership. Sister Namibia, 22(1), 
28-29.
Nkomazana, F. (2006). Polygamy and women within the cultural context in Botswana. Scriptura, 
(92), 265-277.
Ogundare, S. F. (2010). Changes in Family Types and Functions among Yoruba of Southwestern
Nigeria since 1960. Journal Of GLBT Family Studies, 6(4), 447-457. 
doi:10.1080/1550428X.2010.511087
Rehman, J. (2007). THE SHARIA, ISLAMIC FAMILY LAWS AND INTERNATIONAL 
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW: EXAMINING THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF POLYGAMY AND TALAQ. International Journal Of Law, Policy & The Family, 21(1), 108-127. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebl023

Ebola 'will return' to Sierra Leone?

Ebola 'will return' to Salone….


By Abubakarr Talib Jalloh


A day after the Ebola outbreak was declared over in Sierra Leone, Dr. Marshall Elliot, a senior United Kingdom diplomat, warned of its recurrence. Or so Umaru Fofanah, the award winning BBC reporter, made us believe. 


Reactions to what many have labeled as demonic foreboding has been motley. Some scathing attacks have poured down like September rain in the forest region on Dr. Elliot. A commentator damned him as undiplomatic and the comment as a diplomatic blunder. Some people want the UK diplomat to eat the crow for this ill-timed gaffe. In the days of the AFRC junta, this man would have been a candidate for the firing squad; those who have witnessed military regime in the country would remember that many great men lost their lives on account of words they uttered. One writer even proposed that the British national should be arrested for ‘reckless statement”. Marshall you are lucky that this is a different era and that these Face Book commentators are not the holders of power.


The more religious commentators have not only resigned to the destiny-attitude of “God nor go gree”, God forbid or God is in control, some have invoked the name of Jesus to rebuke that statement. These are the liberal ones. The not-so-compromising zealots took a leap further by flinging a curse - “back to sender!!!” (one wrote) – praying that an Ebola outbreak be realized in the United Kingdom rather than Sierra Leone. Marshall you truly should bless you stars that these people do not have the divine grace of Jesus to invoke the demons from the sick and throw them to the swine; you would have had Ebola over night as one of them would have conjured the spirit of illness and “fakay” you with it. If you lived in a medieval African village, Dr. Elliot, you would have been accused of witchcraft and banished. No wonder some have called for you to be PNGed.


One can comprehend the frustration of those who are calling for Marshall to be guillotined. Sierra Leoneans are fed-up with travel restrictions, lock-downs and daily early business houses close-down. They cannot afford to bury additional health workers (200 already died of Ebola), they won’t like to think about more orphans and widows milled out as a result of this dreadful virus.


Wait a minute. Just for the sake of analysis, let us put the manner in which Dr. Elliot spoke to the parking lot; many are concerned with the semantics – the use of the word “will” and would have preferred “may”, (Ebola may come back...). 

Definitive or conditional, the possibility of a reoccurrence has not been entirely excluded. Dr. Elliot may not be the only one with this thinking. And you do not need to look too far to be concerned about a reoccurrence. Weeks after our sister Mano River state, Liberia’s outbreak was confirmed ended in May 2015, new cases emerged in June and July, which called for another declaration of end of Ebola in Liberia on 3 September 2015. If you wish to dig deeper, Uganda provides you with evidence of a recurrence of Ebola in a country. And considering that the Mano River Union states are triplets of a sort with free movements among the countries, we should be bothered that Ebola is yet undefeated in Guinea.


Someone said, Ebola is not over until it is completely eradicated in all three Mano River Union countries. I second this unreservedly.


I would not crucify Dr. Elliot. I choose to see his so-called 'devilish warning' as a challenge. I dare all Sierra Leoneans to pick up this challenge and belie it by our attitude. It is the only way we can give him the benefit of the doubt; that is, if we believe that he doubted our will to continue to be Ebola free. Let's use our will-power to prevent a come back of Ebola. How? 


Those who are not in power (the general citizens) should continue with the basics of Ebola prevention – we know the routine and we should not abandon them just yet. Hand washing is simple and enjoyable; let’s continue with it. Portable sanitizer canisters are part of our hand bags and car carry-ins these days; take them along with you daily and make use of them. We have survived and enjoyed great meals without any bush meat for a year; am sure you can spare those monkeys and baboons a bit longer. Don't revert to bush meat eating too soon (or stop it completely!!). We can seek for a test on corpses to determine if the course of death can allow for the traditional burial practice of washing the dead; we should not automatically revert to washing of dead bodies unless we want Marshall’s warning to come true.  


Those in power (the central government, district and chiefdom authorities) should ensure best practices in hygiene and sanitation are enforced especially in public places /communal infrastructure. They should not throw away the public hand-washing facilities so soon. They should promote the culture of good public health norms including hand-washing in markets centers, schools, shrines, hospitals and so on. Let every district get and maintain a stock of medical emergency kits – personal protective equipment, gloves, spare beddings etc. Councillors should advocate and ensure Ebola survivors are closely monitored through clinical research by competent officials. Traditional leaders should not desist from keeping the awareness level of their subjects on the need to maintain practices that promote good health and abandon those that are inimical and may encourage the spread of any kind of virus and diseases. 


While it is genuine to express frustration on the mention of a possible recurrence of Ebola, it is more relevant to focus on the things that will ensure a reoccurrence is made impossible. Our little efforts in continuing to observe best practices in Ebola prevention is all it takes.